WOMEN-The Rutting Man 2 __________________________ Note: Please do not be offended by what I am writing here. I have tried to write in a 'lighter' vein and (may sometimes) therefore, have 'degenerated' into the vernacular or common language of people. I wish to make it quite clear that I hold women in the highest esteem, unlike (seemingly) many other men. This is what this essay is all about. My father was a gentle man. A 'gentleman' as we say, (two separate words, not one). The notion should remain the same. I hope that I have followed in his footsteps; treating women with a respect not due to their opposite sex but due to the capabilities that women have that men don't, pure and simple. This is known as symbiosis or working together, not opponents on the same chess-board. One of a woman's rôles (if she so chooses in collaboration with her mate) is to be the bearer of their siblings whilst maintaining her own individual character in the same way a man might wish to. She is also the person in a relationship who maintains the place where they live for the man (her hunter/gatherer) and their offspring to be nurtured. A man's rôle is to provide shelter, food, security and family harmony. It is, therefore, his place not only to hunt and gather but to ensure the security of his more vulnerable mate and offspring. After all, he has a biological strength his mate doesn't. In terms of mental ability, let's say they are different and (positively as opposed to negatively) leave it at that. What a man does not have is the same biological survival skills of his mate. That is why they must be symbiotic, viz. working together. Not as one, but as separate individuals with their own skills which should complement each other. This does not equate man with woman, that does not exist, it's a stupid thing to think otherwise. It merely means that they work together honing their particular skills for the benefit of all the 'family'. Men and women are not 'equal', they never can be; they have their own skills independently. An equation does not exist because the terms are totally different. This same argument applies to every single person on the planet. There is no such thing as equality, full stop. The only equality is that there is no equality. It is because both men and women have a lop-sided view of their 'rôles', which are human constructs for a particular type of control, that the world is so messed up, for goodness sake. Now we have a situation where no-one seems to know what sex they are! We are becoming trans-gender, for goodness sake! What really worries me is that behaviours which do not match a view that men and women are different, and have different rôles to play are being confused with behaviours which are not in accordance with this. Mankind would not have survived if homosexual/lesbian/BDSM behaviours were rampant. Okay, there are the odd few 'problems' but to publicly acknowledge this as an 'alternative' life-style is very sad (and a bit worrying? What types of people are promoting this stuff?). The nature of men is (apart from the odd hunting and gathering) sex. That sex is the same as any other animal. It is what we call 'rutting'. Man has developed this into a fine art, including homosexuality/lesbianism, paedophilia and many other perverted behaviours just for the sake of gratification beyond the sexual nature of humans-as-a-whole. Such behaviours are not acceptable in terms of human survival, or for most people's common decency and self-respect. This is not meant to be moralistic but pure common sense. I don't care if my fellow being is of this unusual behaviour is as long as he/she/it keeps it to themselves. I value my own sexuality as that of a caring human being. These other 'people' do not care. They are only out for their own hedonistic pleasure, it has nothing to do with the human race-as-a-whole. These people lack humanity. They would not survive for long on their own. Women have been worldly denigrated by the priests of male-hood. Women are more than often treated as chattels for the gratification of men. They are masturbatory devices for men's perverted sexual conducts. They have been feminised to become  lesbians. Lied to, that they are equal to men. They are neither superior, inferior or otherwise. They have been denigrated to rubber blow-up dolls for the  self-gratification of men. Men 0 Women 0; that's the score in this game. Bigger is better. The bigger the 'dick' the more pleasure she'll get; that's the notion. Well, I learned that it's not what you have it's how you use it. (No jokes here, please!) Women, on the other hand have been led to believe that because men like breasts, the bigger they are the better (especially in that stolen land the strange USA). That sums it up. 'Love' to a lot of people is merely self-gratification. Love is a developed feeling for another person. It is not sexual contact, it is fellow-feeling. Sexual contact may be part of 'love', it is not love itself; that is a state beyond sex. Many people have a relationship not based on sexual contact. As one gets older, the urges of procreation do not matter any more. There may be no sexual (or little, or much) contact but it is fellow-feeling that matters. Men constantly look at younger women, that is natural (and most often harmless) but it does not mean that they must pursue them sexually; theirs is often a forbidden hope! The same may well go for women and that is mostly forlorn as well. (Lay off the make-up and let's see what you really get!) As I said once: Beauty is in the light of the candle. Given that Man/Woman is an animal that is (seemingly) conscious of being aware, it is hard to understand how they can degenerate from human to humanoid with all the fakeries of life as it is presented to us, if we let it. I'll pass on that and remain human. Evie, I love you.

Return to CONTENTS page