UNDERSTANDING THE NO GERM THEORY
__________________________________________
Foreword
I
want to make this article as simple as possible. I also want to make it
available to those with a little more data under their belt. So I am
apologising to anyone who reads this for either notion, that of
treating the intellect as not available, or oversimplifying.
The
contents of this article may be verified through many different
sources, each with different and contradictory ideas. However, in my
view, the idea behind 'teaching' is to 'teach (show) how they might
learn, not what they learn.
The word 'people' has two, at least
connotations: a) those who want to 'learn' and b) those who are
forcibly 'taught' through a system of education that may or may not
have vested self-interests and may or may not be a benefit for the
'taught' individual and others who may be 'infected' by that subsequent
'teaching'.
The reason that this pre-amble is so long is because
it is so important, whatever your thinking. I am assuming, of course
that you are an independently thinking animal without a closed mind.
Zombies are not allowed to think; apparently.
I am intending to
be didactic (make statements without any forensic evidence). The
intention is to make a reader aware of a notion (idea) and to research
the statement themselves to make up their own mind. This will be very
difficult for the 'brainwashed' who only tend to be interested in other
people's lives (a.k.a. Main Sewer Media (MSM) 'readers'), I am not,
except where they impinge on me personally. I do not have to worry
about what is happening in the outside world because I have no control
of it. I can only control what is in my power to do so. The rest is
nonsense and don't believe anything else.
Thesis
All flora and fauna are self-perpetuating, self-healing organisms.
Given the correct nutrition and environment all can 'live' for long periods of time without obvious 'illness' or 'dis-ease'.
Nature does not provide 'good' or 'bad' of anything, it just provides within the structure of the Universe.
There is no need for any outside agencies (gods and so forth) but there may be a want.
How that Universe works, is, in my belief, unknowable.
'Accidents'
do occur, of course and, given the capacity to help solve them,
we should of course, do so. At some level, all fauna (at least) have
some propensity to do this.
Every person is responsible for their own provision of the correct nutrition and environment.
On this particular planet, what we call the 'sun' provides all that is necessary, however that may be.
What we call 'survival' is the means by which we allow what we call 'nature' to work towards that survival.
The
Universe is holistic and it would seem logical that all else that
follows must be part of that holisticism since everything is part of
everything else and cannot be separated.
The Universe is
continuous (analogue), it is not composed of discrete particles (they
are a convenience for study) otherwise we go to insane lengths to find
the 'ultimate' particle which cannot exist (e.g. the so-called 'Higgs
boson'). The search for such is a game and has no relevance whatsoever
to survival or longevity of same.
Thus, the search for digital
bits and pieces will never work because everything needs everything
else to work. Analysing the components of a clock can never tell us how
it works. It only works when it is put together. As Euclid said: the
whole is more than the sum of the parts.
Let us make a start.
The body is composed mostly of proteins. It is controlled by the brain, which is why it is there.
The body is composed of special organs/cells that perform all its functions.
Those functions preserve the body and maintain its integrity (wholeness).
The body is self-healing, providing the terrain is not compromised or interfered with in any way.
Terrain is a good word because it encompasses all that we know and use about nature for our survival.
The body is designed to survive, therefore it needs to maintain its terrain in such a state so to survive.
If
you damage the terrain in any way not compatible with survival, the
body will return to its state of inactivity until it is revived once
more.
Maintenance of the terrain is therefore the most important activity we can pursue.
Nature
has provided all that is necessary because nature is the only
thing we have. Anything else is a falsity of nature and needs to be
regarded as such. Nature provides everything.
The
animal/creature that we call Man appears to greater extent made it a
purpose to circumnavigate nature and struggles to provide a territory
that does not exist in nature. This is and will be the downfall of man,
not some mythical apocalypse (also decided by some man/men).
So,
the territory of your body is your personal responsibility. No-one
asked to be here but we are and have to suffer the consequences
(positive or negative). We must learn how to survive.
Apart from
momentary care by those who have borne us, we are on our own. We need
to learn as best we can our own survival mechanisms. We need teachers
who will aid us in this quest.
Healthy people do not get sick.
This is a truism. If you maintain your bodily territory using nature's
own 'gifts', then you will never get sick. Barring accidental injury
(or obvious violence upon a person) the body will (and does, every
second of every day) heal itself.
Nature has not provided deadly
germs (pathogens) or otherwise. Nature's job is the creation of
life-forms and provides the wherewithal to survive. If one chooses not
to follow this path, then 'sickness' and 'dis-ease' will ensue.
It
is essential for a healthy body to be maintained as such and not to
ingest material which is anathema to it (as far as is possible).
The
'germ' theory has produced more sickness than anything else. Actually,
this is a 'known'. It is the intent of the peddlers of this theory to
maintain it for their own ends and that is the truth of the matter.
Aside: In my view, the worst possible scenario the 'germ' theory has
produced (apart from killing milk
with needless Pasteurisation) is the use of injecting foreign toxic
materials into otherwise healthy
babies and others (and yes, this is a deliberate
statement designed to invoke a
response); in words, vaccination or inoculation. This
practice is as reprehensible as
it is useless and proven to be so. Do not kid yourselves
that the 'authorities' do not
know this. Vaccination could well be the death of Man
before any nuclear holocaust. In
the meantime, like 'cancer' it is a going concern for
the money-makers.
Apologies for the aside.
I apologise for the above aside. I was trying not to get (too)
political but it is virtually
impossible. Who has your best interests at heart? Just a simple
question. If your
answer is the 'government', you lose, don't bother
with the two hundred
quid/dollars/etc.
Mind
you, the 'germ' theory is a pretty good theory, even if false (it has
been proven false even before it was let loose by Pasteur, the rogue
chemist). It makes an awkward kind of sense.
However, it is
rubbish. As I have said, Nature does not produce 'good' or 'bad'
things. The notions of these opposites are MAN-MADE (possibly in Japan,
China, USA, UK or heaven knows where else depending on your political
proclivities; some foreign planet due for the Next Generation Star Wars
movie treatment?)
However, when we treat with 'orthodox' or
'allopathic' medicine in preference to Nature's own, we fail miserably
and destructively.
It is amazing to me, how well the body deals
with the everyday assault on its terrain. But how much suffering is
encountered is criminally insane when we refuse Nature.
When we
'treat' the 'symptoms' we in fact are compromising the healing. Your
'cold' symptoms are the result of healing, not a dis-ease. And yes, the
dreaded 'cancer' is the result of an unexpected traumatic experience
which may or may not be resolved. It is a conflict.
Why do some
'cancer' patients seem to be later, free from this 'cancer'? Because
they resolved the conflict that created the 'symptoms'. The brain said,
'thanks very much' and got on with its healing job. Once we start to
slash, burn and poison the symptoms (which are actually the healing),
the end is nigh. The 'treatment' kills the patient, not the 'cancer'.
If
the germ theory were correct, there would be no-one alive to believe
it. How does one think that Mankind has survived for thousands of years
without 'modern' medicine?
What has 'modern' medicine achieved?
Huxley said, correctly in my view, at least: Modern medicine has been so successful there are hardly any healthy people left.
It's
obvious some people have an agenda. They know it. However, they have
duped total populations with total nonsense and, apparently, succeeded.
Your only appearance on this agenda is your ill-health. It's so obvious.
By
the way, the only 'alternative' medicine is present
'orthodox/allopathic' medicine, not the other way around in this
topsy-turvy world.
Orthodox/allopathic medicine is the Dark
Ages of health bought by pharmaceutical 'snake oil' companies and
endorsed by the receivers of pieces of silver.
I do not believe
(at present) that there is a way out of this. I think that medicine as
it is performed at present will continue as long as the public is
unaware of what health is, the personal maintenance of bodily terrain,
however that may be accomplished using what are natural products. One
could, I suppose, start with sunshine...
If the present level of
'orthodox' medicine is maintained, Man is bound to die out very soon.
There is no way out unless there is some personal enlightenment and the
desire to find it.
Germ theory equals:
A life of self destruction through :
* Toxic vaccinations/inoculations
* Endless useless but toxic drugs
* Time and energy wasted visiting 'doctors' who know nothing about health
* Being biopsied and sliced open.
* Endless misery from induced worry about ill-health
No germ theory equals:
* No immune system
* No 'infections'
* No anti-bodies
* No 'bad germs' (even if they existed)
* Self-healing through sunshine and a decent diet and exercise and trying to keep calm.
* Much less to worry about.
So, what is the secret to a healthy life?
Do what you can to maintain the integrity of your person (as far as possible):
Proper rest
As decent/varied a diet (less is often more?)
Sunshine without a cover-up or D3 5000mg capsules
Adequate natural vitamins and minderals (try hemp 1000mg capsules?)
Concern yourself about your health before others or you can not help them
As little 'modern' technology as possible?
Don't see a doctor
Don't read any 'news' about your health
Take your own responsibility
Never, ever, listen to 'researchers', 'experts', 'doctors',
'scientists' or any other
un-named persons who tell you
anything.
For goodness sake have a sense of humour, even if 'American'.
My compliments to you for reading this.
Peter K. Sharpen
Cert.Ed., Dip.S.E.
(some people like qualifications after a name; I am not one of them but they are real.)
Life was made to be difficult only because you wanted it so. Peter K. Sharpen
Return
to CONTENTS page